Commonwealth v. Madden
474 A.2d 690, 327 Pa. Super. 627
This text of 474 A.2d 690 (Commonwealth v. Madden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Madden, 474 A.2d 690, 327 Pa. Super. 627 (Pa. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Affirmed in part and reversed in part with judgment of sentence vacated and case remanded for an evidentiary hearing. If the lower court finds that counsel was ineffective, then it should grant appropriate relief. If appellant is unable to sustain his contentions that trial counsel was ineffective, then judgment of sentence should be reimposed.
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Com. v. Madden-El, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
474 A.2d 690, 327 Pa. Super. 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-madden-pasuperct-1984.