Commonwealth v. Macklin, D.

143 A.3d 890, 636 Pa. 392, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1706
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedAugust 4, 2016
Docket288 MAL 2015 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 143 A.3d 890 (Commonwealth v. Macklin, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Macklin, D., 143 A.3d 890, 636 Pa. 392, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1706 (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether the government is required to include notice of its intent to seek a mandatory penalty under a recidivist statute within the charging document since such mandatory penalties equate to new, aggravated crimes?

This matter is consolidated with Commonwealth v. Bragg, 67 EAL 2016 and Commonwealth v. Sachette, 973 MAL 2015 for oral argument.

Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Diaz
152 A.3d 1040 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Commonwealth v. Tooks
151 A.3d 666 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 A.3d 890, 636 Pa. 392, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-macklin-d-pa-2016.