Commonwealth v. Mackay
This text of 58 N.E. 1027 (Commonwealth v. Mackay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Both in the popular and legal sense, the word “ lottery ” signifies a scheme for the distribution of prizes by chance. Cent. Diet. “Lottery.” Bouvier’s Law Diet. “Lottery.”
Pub. Sts. c. 209, § 1, forbids the setting up of a lottery for money, or other thing of value, and while the complaint may be defective in form in not saying that the lottery was for money or other thing of value, Commonwealth v. Horton, 2 Gray, 69, the term is broad enough to include such a lottery, and, after trial and conviction, it is to be assumed that the evidence warranted a conviction of setting up an illegal lottery within the terms of the statute. Such an offence was witiiin the jurisdiction of the court.
The defendant, having gone to trial upon the defective complaint, cannot now take advantage of the defect by motion in arrest of judgment. Pub. Sts. c. 214, § 27. For further legislation as to lotteries, see St. 1892, c. 409 ; St. 1895, c. 419, §§ 1, 2, 3, 8, 9.
Motion in arrest of judgment overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 N.E. 1027, 177 Mass. 345, 1901 Mass. LEXIS 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mackay-mass-1901.