Commonwealth v. Mack

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Mack

764 A.2d 1

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 20, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 764 A.2d 1 (Commonwealth v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Mack, 764 A.2d 1 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial court’s denial of Petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search of her luggage, based on the court’s determination that Petitioner validly consented to the search of her luggage when, after confining her in the airport security office, the police told her that she could consent to an immediate search or they would get a warrant?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial court’s denial of Petitioner’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search of her luggage, based on the court’s determination that Petitioner validly consented to the search of her luggage when, after confining her in the airport security office, the police told her that she could consent to an immediate search or they would get a warrant?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 A.2d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-mack-pa-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack