Commonwealth v. Lyon

Warren County Court of Common Pleas

Commonwealth v. Lyon

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 60, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 100

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County

DecidedDecember 15, 1975

Docketno. 20

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 60 (Commonwealth v. Lyon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Lyon, 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 60, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 100 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLFE, P.J.,

Defendant appeals his conviction in the magistrate’s court for violation of section 1007 of The Vehicle Code of April29,1959, P.L. 58 (No. 29), as amended, 75P.S. §1007, and we reverse, on the demurrer of defendant at the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s case for the reason that, accepting all of the facts as true [61]*61to this point, the evidence is insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

On October 12, 1975, the arresting officer, while traveling east on U.S. Route 6, observed two other vehicles proceeding ahead of defendant’s vehicle. The lead vehicle came to a stop preparatory to a left turn and to await oncoming traffic, causing the second vehicle to also stop. Defendant thereupon executed a right pass of the second vehicle and continued on Route 6, whereupon he was stopped and arrested.

Section 1007 mandates the duty of an operator in overtaking a vehicle ahead of him in the following language:

“The driver of any vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass at a safe distance to the left thereof, and shall not again drive to the right side of the highway until safely clear of such overtaken vehicle ...”

We have found no reported cases interpreting this factual situation. However, we are of the opinion that a fair reading of the act does not conclude a legislative intent to have it apply in this situation. The act applies to moving vehicles traveling on a two-lane highway, and there is no indication that it is applicable to stationary vehicles. The obvious intent is to have an orderly flow of traffic without increasing the danger of passes on both sides of a preceding vehicle which would cause an intolerable traffic hazard.

For these reasons we enter the following

ORDER

And now, December 15,1975, defendant is found not guilty, his bail is released and he is discharged from the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLFE, P.J.,

Defendant appeals his conviction in the magistrate’s court for violation of section 1007 of The Vehicle Code of April29,1959, P.L. 58 (No. 29), as amended, 75P.S. §1007, and we reverse, on the demurrer of defendant at the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s case for the reason that, accepting all of the facts as true [61]*61to this point, the evidence is insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

On October 12, 1975, the arresting officer, while traveling east on U.S. Route 6, observed two other vehicles proceeding ahead of defendant’s vehicle. The lead vehicle came to a stop preparatory to a left turn and to await oncoming traffic, causing the second vehicle to also stop. Defendant thereupon executed a right pass of the second vehicle and continued on Route 6, whereupon he was stopped and arrested.

Section 1007 mandates the duty of an operator in overtaking a vehicle ahead of him in the following language:

“The driver of any vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass at a safe distance to the left thereof, and shall not again drive to the right side of the highway until safely clear of such overtaken vehicle ...”

We have found no reported cases interpreting this factual situation. However, we are of the opinion that a fair reading of the act does not conclude a legislative intent to have it apply in this situation. The act applies to moving vehicles traveling on a two-lane highway, and there is no indication that it is applicable to stationary vehicles. The obvious intent is to have an orderly flow of traffic without increasing the danger of passes on both sides of a preceding vehicle which would cause an intolerable traffic hazard.

For these reasons we enter the following

ORDER

And now, December 15,1975, defendant is found not guilty, his bail is released and he is discharged from the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 60, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-lyon-pactcomplwarren-1975.