Commonwealth v. Lynn
91 A.3d 1233
This text of 91 A.3d 1233 (Commonwealth v. Lynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Lynn, 91 A.3d 1233 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2014, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Was the evidence insufficient to prove endangering the welfare of children because defendant did not have direct contact with children?
(2) Assuming arguendo defendant could not endanger the welfare of children in his individual capacity, but as part of a general scheme placed a known sexual predator under his control in a position that promoted the risk of further sexual assaults, was the evidence sufficient to convict him as an accomplice?
[1234]*1234The Petition for Leave to Reply to Respondent’s Brief in Opposition is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Com. v. Lynn, W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lynn, W.
114 A.3d 796 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 A.3d 1233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-lynn-pa-2014.