Commonwealth v. Lynch

996 A.2d 1063, 606 Pa. 228, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1354

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Lynch. Read the opinion of the Court — 616 Pa. 542 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 23, 2010·No. Nos. 405 EAL 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether Petitioner’s traffic court convictions in 2007 for violations of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(b)(1) and other summary offenses under the Vehicle Code, based on incidents which occurred on August 31, 2004, September 6, 2004 and September 13, 2004, were barred by the two-year limitation period provided by 42 Pa.C.S. § 5553(e) at the time of the offenses at issue?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether Petitioner’s traffic court convictions in 2007 for violations of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(b)(1) and other summary offenses under the Vehicle Code, based on incidents which occurred on August 31, 2004, September 6, 2004 and September 13, 2004, were barred by the two-year limitation period provided by 42 Pa.C.S. § 5553(e) at the time of the offenses at issue?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Lynch, 996 A.2d 1063, 606 Pa. 228, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1354 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

996 A.2d 1063 (Commonwealth v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

§ 1543

Pennsylvania § 1543(b)(1)

§ 5553

Pennsylvania § 5553(e)

Opinion

Related