Commonwealth v. Lund
15 A.2d 839, 142 Pa. Super. 208, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 539
Opinion
The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Reader.
Judgment affirmed, and it is ordered that the defendant appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal in this case was made a supersedeas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Lund, 15 A.2d 839, 142 Pa. Super. 208, 1940 Pa. Super. LEXIS 539 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).
15 A.2d 839 (Commonwealth v. Lund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pinnacle Amusement, LLC v. BLCE
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2023
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 2003
Commonwealth v. Wida
12 Pa. D. & C.3d 1 (Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1979)
National Football League v. Governor of the Delaware
435 F. Supp. 1372 (D. Delaware, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Blythe
115 A.2d 906 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Commonwealth v. Laniewski
98 A.2d 215 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
State v. Mabrey
56 N.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1953)
Commonwealth v. Logan
94 A.2d 99 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Commonwealth v. Cusano
79 Pa. D. & C. 435 (Northampton County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1951)
Commonwealth v. Mittelman
36 A.2d 860 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Commonwealth v. Malco-Memphis Theatres, Inc.
169 S.W.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)
Commonwealth v. Townsend
27 A.2d 462 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Meserole v. Sutton
41 Pa. D. & C. 408 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1941)