Commonwealth v. Lu
Opinion
On February 17, 1994, the parties to this interlocutory appeal stipulated to its dismissal. Included on the stipulation was one signature line for a single justice and the filing was captioned as both a stipulation and order.
No appeal, interlocutory or not, may be dismissed by a single justice of this Court. See Com. R. App. P. 27(d). Once a case has been docketed with this Court,1 an appeal may be dismissed upon stipulation by the clerk of court only where the parties have specified the terms as to payment of costs. Com. R. App. P. 42(b). Otherwise, the appellant must move this Court for the dismissal. Id.; Com. R. App. P. 27(a).
In this matter no motion accompanied the stipulation; therefore, it is not properly before this Court. However, because this interlocutory appeal stems from a pending criminal action, we will dismiss the case pursuant to Com. R. App. P. 2.2 Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
4 N. Mar. I. 93 (Commonwealth v. Lu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.