Commonwealth v. Loughnane, D.
158 A.3d 1224, 638 Pa. 728, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1491
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 19, 2016
Docket164 MAL 2016 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 158 A.3d 1224 (Commonwealth v. Loughnane, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Loughnane, D., 158 A.3d 1224, 638 Pa. 728, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1491 (Pa. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues.
Whether the Superior Court erred by holding that the automobile exception, adopted in Commonwealth v. Gary, 625 Pa. 183, 91 A.3d 102 (2014), allowed police to seize a vehicle from the defendant’s private residential driveway without a warrant?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Com. v. Loughnane, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Commonwealth v. Loughnane
173 A.3d 733 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Com. v. Duodu, W.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 A.3d 1224, 638 Pa. 728, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-loughnane-d-pa-2016.