Commonwealth v. Lord
18 N.E. 67, 147 Mass. 399, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 117
This text of 18 N.E. 67 (Commonwealth v. Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Lord, 18 N.E. 67, 147 Mass. 399, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 117 (Mass. 1888).
Opinion
It was sufficient to prove that the offence charged was committed during a substantial part of the time named in the complaint. Commonwealth v. Kerrissey, 141 Mass. 110. The use of the word “ continually ” was unnecessary. It does not change or affect the identity of the offence charged, and it may be disregarded as surplusage.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Eveland v. Erickson
182 N.W. 315 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1921)
Cox v. State
205 S.W. 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Territory v. Takamine
21 Haw. 465 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1913)
Commonwealth v. Peretz
98 N.E. 1054 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 N.E. 67, 147 Mass. 399, 1888 Mass. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-lord-mass-1888.