Commonwealth v. Long

2 Va. 318
CourtGeneral Court of Virginia
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. 318 (Commonwealth v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Long, 2 Va. 318 (Va. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

WHITE, J.,

delivered the judgment of the Court:

• 1. That the fact, that a Grand Juror is the owner of a Mill, can be pleaded in abatement to a Presentment made by the Grand Jury. 2. That it is proper to admit that plea, although another plea in abatement was at the same time pleaded, and issue joined thereon.

Note (In edition of 1853). — It is thus decided, that the disqualification of being Constables, owners of Mills, &c. is put on the same footing as the qualification of Citizenship, and Freehold. A Presentment, made by a Grand Juror who possesses the former, as well as the'one whowantsthe latter, maybe avoided by plea in abatement. See the Case of William Cherry, laboriously árgued and decided by the Court, ante, p. 20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Va. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-long-vagensess-1822.