Commonwealth v. Long

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Long

805 A.2d 1244, 569 Pa. 562, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1813

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 28, 2002

DocketAppeal No. 759 WAL 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 805 A.2d 1244 (Commonwealth v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Long, 805 A.2d 1244, 569 Pa. 562, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1813 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of August 2002, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether a search warrant is unconstitutional or invalid under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution or former Rule 2003 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the police officer transmitted, via facsimile machine, his signed “application for search warrant” and “affidavit of probable cause” to a district justice before swearing to the documents over the telephone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of August 2002, the petition for allowance of appeal is granted, limited to the following issue:

Whether a search warrant is unconstitutional or invalid under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution or former Rule 2003 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure where the police officer transmitted, via facsimile machine, his signed “application for search warrant” and “affidavit of probable cause” to a district justice before swearing to the documents over the telephone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

805 A.2d 1244, 569 Pa. 562, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-long-pa-2002.