Commonwealth v. Long Keeper of the Gaol

5 Binn. 489, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 21
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 1813·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The construction of the act is this, that the prisoner is not entitled to a discharge, unless he has remained in confinement for the fine, thirty days beyond the time adjudged for imprisonment; and when he has remained such thirty days, he is entitled to a discharge both as respects the fine and the costs. But neither fine, nor costs, are remitted. If the criminal has property, his property is liable for both.

Prisoners discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Long Keeper of the Gaol, 5 Binn. 489, 1813 Pa. LEXIS 21 (Pa. 1813).

5 Binn. 489 (Commonwealth v. Long Keeper of the Gaol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petition of Kishbaugh
19 A. 1063 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)
County of Schuylkill v. Reifsnyder
46 Pa. 446 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1864)