Commonwealth v. Logan
This text of 393 A.2d 363 (Commonwealth v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction by a jury of third degree murder, criminal conspiracy and aggravated assault. Appellant contends
(1) after-discovered evidence mandates granting a new trial;
(2) oral statements made by appellant immediately preceding and immediately following his arrest should have been suppressed;
(3) the identification of appellant at the preliminary hearing by an eyewitness was invalid;
(4) the trial court erred in refusing to order disclosure of an informant;
(5) the seizure of an automobile was without probable cause and the identification of the auto at trial was invalid;
(6) the indictment against appellant should have been quashed; and
(7) a mistrial should have been granted due to prosecutorial misconduct.
[33]*33We have carefully reviewed each of these issues and find them to be without merit.
The judgments of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 A.2d 363, 482 Pa. 31, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-logan-pa-1978.