Commonwealth v. Linton

2 Va. 476
General Court of Virginia·Decided June 15, 1825·Published

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.,

delivered- the opinion of the Court:

In regard to the first question on which the opinion of this Court is required, it may be observed, that no direct response can be made, because neither a general affirmance or denial of the proposition, would be true.

The rule is, that the false making and forging any instrument, whereby another may be injured, constitutes the offence of forgery, even though the writing be of such a character, that it would not, if genuine, be effectual to its purpose, provided the defect in its frame or character, be not open and palpable, so that no one could be deceived by it, without the grossest negligence.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Linton, 2 Va. 476 (Va. Super. Ct. 1825).

2 Va. 476 (Commonwealth v. Linton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.