Commonwealth v. Linton, B., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Linton, B., Pet (Commonwealth v. Linton, B., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 261 WAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : BRENDAN ALEXANDER LINTON, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of April, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Section 3364(b)(2) of the Vehicle Code requires individuals operating pedalcycles to “use reasonable efforts so as not to impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic.” Does a proper construction of the Vehicle Code inform the meaning of reasonable efforts and foreclose any interpretation that it includes leaving the roadway whenever faster moving traffic approaches or backs up, which would effectively prohibit operation of pedalcycles on most roadways and/or endanger those operating them throughout the Commonwealth?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Linton, B., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-linton-b-pet-pa-2024.