Commonwealth v. Leskoski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Leskoski

74 A. 217, 225 Pa. 382, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 669

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 22, 1909

DocketAppeal, No. 160

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 A. 217 (Commonwealth v. Leskoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Leskoski, 74 A. 217, 225 Pa. 382, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 669 (Pa. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

If the first and second assignments of error are to be entertained, they are dismissed on the opinion of the court below, discharging the rule to show cause why the transcript of the official stenographer’s notes of testimony should not be amended. The testimony which is the subject of the third and fourth assignments, though received in rebuttal, was properly commented upon in the charge. The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below for the purpose of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

If the first and second assignments of error are to be entertained, they are dismissed on the opinion of the court below, discharging the rule to show cause why the transcript of the official stenographer’s notes of testimony should not be amended. The testimony which is the subject of the third and fourth assignments, though received in rebuttal, was properly commented upon in the charge. The judgment is affirmed and the record remitted to the court below for the purpose of execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A. 217, 225 Pa. 382, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-leskoski-pa-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack