Commonwealth v. Lehman, R.
This text of Commonwealth v. Lehman, R. (Commonwealth v. Lehman, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 202 WAL 2022 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : RONNIE LEHMAN, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court majority erred in concluding that prior counsel rendered ineffective assistance for failing to pursue on appeal a claim that the evidence was insufficient to sustain Respondent’s conviction under 18 Pa.C.S. § 5123(a.2) (Contraband), because he was not an inmate at the time he unlawfully possessed a controlled substance, where, pursuant to the relevant statute and legislation, he was an inmate?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Lehman, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-lehman-r-pa-2022.