Commonwealth v. Lehman, M.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 47 MAP 2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 69 MAL 2019 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MICHAEL A. LEHMAN, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:
Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred as a matter of law by holding that the costs relating to contested expert testimony in a contested resentencing do not constitute costs of prosecution under 16 P.S. §1403, [ ] and are ineligible for imposition upon a defendant reimbursement as part of a sentence as a matter of law rather than the sentencing court’s discretion[?]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Lehman, M. (Commonwealth v. Lehman, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.