Commonwealth v. Lehman, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 25, 2019·No. 69 MAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 47 MAP 2019

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 69 MAL 2019 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MICHAEL A. LEHMAN, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:

Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred as a matter of law by holding that the costs relating to contested expert testimony in a contested resentencing do not constitute costs of prosecution under 16 P.S. §1403, [ ] and are ineligible for imposition upon a defendant reimbursement as part of a sentence as a matter of law rather than the sentencing court’s discretion[?]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Lehman, M., (Pa. 2019).

Commonwealth v. Lehman, M. (Commonwealth v. Lehman, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.