Commonwealth v. Leavy

15 A.3d 66, 609 Pa. 100, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 479
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 1, 2011·No. 563 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*101 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of MARCH, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Where a criminal defendant is accused of committing a crime as a juvenile, but the Commonwealth does not learn of the offense until after the defendant has reached the age of 21, does it violate the accused’s due process rights to prosecute the offense in criminal court?

In responding to the above-referenced question, the parties are specifically directed to address the common law rebuttable presumption that a child under the age of 14 is considered incapable of forming the requisite intent to commit a crime. See, Commonwealth v. Kocher, 529 Pa. 303, 602 A.2d 1308 (1992); In the Interest of G. T., 409 Pa.Super. 15, 597 A.2d 638 (1991).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Leavy, 15 A.3d 66, 609 Pa. 100, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 479 (Pa. 2011).

15 A.3d 66 (Commonwealth v. Leavy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

La Weight Loss Centers, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
15 A.3d 66 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)