Commonwealth v. Kramer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Kramer

58 A.2d 193, 162 Pa. Super. 448, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1948

DocketAppeal, 184

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 58 A.2d 193 (Commonwealth v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Kramer, 58 A.2d 193, 162 Pa. Super. 448, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257 (Pa. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Defendant was indicted, convicted, and sentenced for a violation of section 524 of the Penal Code of June *449 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS § 4524. It provides that one is guilty of a misdemeanor who “sells, lends* distributes, . . . offers to sell, lend, distribute, . . . or -has in; his possession with intent to sell, lend, distribute . .. . any obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, indecent or disgusting book, magazine, pamphlet, newspaper, . . . or any written or printed matter of an indecent character,

Defendant waived trial by a jury and elected to be tried by a judge without a jury. Following the trial, at which defendant presented evidence on his own behalf, the trial judge rendered a verdict of guilty. The sentence subsequently imposed was a fine of $50 which defendant paid immediately and in full. Defendant has appealed from the judgment.

Defendant, on appeal to this Court, would question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, and contend that the magazine in question was not in fact obscene. We are precluded from passing upon the substantive question which defendant attempts to raise. When defendant paid the fine in full which had been imposed, there was a complete compliance with the sentence of the court; the questions became moot; the matter was at an end, and no right of appeal existed thereafter from the satisfied judgment and. sentence. Com. v. Gipner, 118 Pa. 379, 12 A. 306; Township of Haverford v. Armstrong et al., 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 152; Com. ex rel. Wilhelm v. Weigley, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 189; City of McKeesport v. Dunn, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 194; Reap’s Appeal, 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 147; Deen’s Appeal, 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 376, 5 A. 2d 613; 2 Am. Jur., Appeal and Error, § 231, p. 987; Annotation: 18 A.L.R. 867; Annotation: 74 A.L.R. 638. The sentence imposed constituted the final judgment of the court. By the payment of the fine this was' satisfied! Defendant now seeks to raise a mere moot question. See Com. ex rel. McCarty v. Cairns, 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 96.

*450 Defendant’s right of appeal in a summary conviction, even though the fine and costs are paid, is now preserved in this Commonwealth where the statutory requirements are met. Acts of July 11, 1917, P. L. 771, and April 1, 1925, P. L. 98, amending the Act of April 17, 1876, P. L. 29, 19 PS § 1189. These acts, however, have no application where, as here, the offense involved is a misdemeanor.

The appeal is quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Defendant was indicted, convicted, and sentenced for a violation of section 524 of the Penal Code of June *449 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS § 4524. It provides that one is guilty of a misdemeanor who “sells, lends* distributes, . . . offers to sell, lend, distribute, . . . or -has in; his possession with intent to sell, lend, distribute . .. . any obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, indecent or disgusting book, magazine, pamphlet, newspaper, . . . or any written or printed matter of an indecent character,

Defendant waived trial by a jury and elected to be tried by a judge without a jury. Following the trial, at which defendant presented evidence on his own behalf, the trial judge rendered a verdict of guilty. The sentence subsequently imposed was a fine of $50 which defendant paid immediately and in full. Defendant has appealed from the judgment.

Defendant, on appeal to this Court, would question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, and contend that the magazine in question was not in fact obscene. We are precluded from passing upon the substantive question which defendant attempts to raise. When defendant paid the fine in full which had been imposed, there was a complete compliance with the sentence of the court; the questions became moot; the matter was at an end, and no right of appeal existed thereafter from the satisfied judgment and. sentence. Com. v. Gipner, 118 Pa. 379, 12 A. 306; Township of Haverford v. Armstrong et al., 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 152; Com. ex rel. Wilhelm v. Weigley, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 189; City of McKeesport v. Dunn, 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 194; Reap’s Appeal, 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 147; Deen’s Appeal, 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 376, 5 A. 2d 613; 2 Am. Jur., Appeal and Error, § 231, p. 987; Annotation: 18 A.L.R. 867; Annotation: 74 A.L.R. 638. The sentence imposed constituted the final judgment of the court. By the payment of the fine this was' satisfied! Defendant now seeks to raise a mere moot question. See Com. ex rel. McCarty v. Cairns, 46 Pa. Superior Ct. 96.

*450 Defendant’s right of appeal in a summary conviction, even though the fine and costs are paid, is now preserved in this Commonwealth where the statutory requirements are met. Acts of July 11, 1917, P. L. 771, and April 1, 1925, P. L. 98, amending the Act of April 17, 1876, P. L. 29, 19 PS § 1189. These acts, however, have no application where, as here, the offense involved is a misdemeanor.

The appeal is quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.2d 193, 162 Pa. Super. 448, 1948 Pa. Super. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-kramer-pasuperct-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack