Commonwealth v. KNOBLE
988 A.2d 1288, 605 Pa. 256, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 3, 2010
Docket509 MAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 988 A.2d 1288 (Commonwealth v. KNOBLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. KNOBLE, 988 A.2d 1288, 605 Pa. 256, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 81 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding a probationer may invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for an unrelated offense, regardless of whether the information will be used in subsequent criminal proceedings, and whether such invocation must be made at the time of interrogation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Com. v. Metterhauser, T.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Commonwealth v. Knoble
42 A.3d 976 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
988 A.2d 1288, 605 Pa. 256, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-knoble-pa-2010.