Commonwealth v. Klueber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Klueber

879 A.2d 156

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Klueber. Read the opinion of the Court — 588 Pa. 401 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 7, 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of July 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether the Superior Court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the trial court in finding that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing?

Whether the Superior Court improperly based its decision on information not in the record and not argued to the trial court, specifically, the report of the Institute on Crime, Justice and Correction at George Washington University?

Whether the Superior Court exceeded its authority in sua sponte ordering re-sentencing before a different judge?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of July 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following questions:

Whether the Superior Court improperly substituted its judgment for that of the trial court in finding that the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing?

Whether the Superior Court improperly based its decision on information not in the record and not argued to the trial court, specifically, the report of the Institute on Crime, Justice and Correction at George Washington University?

Whether the Superior Court exceeded its authority in sua sponte ordering re-sentencing before a different judge?

Commonwealth v. Klueber, 879 A.2d 156 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

879 A.2d 156 (Commonwealth v. Klueber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.