Commonwealth v. Kithcart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Kithcart

338 A.2d 592, 462 Pa. 155

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 17, 1975

DocketAppeal No. 95

StatusPublished

This text of 338 A.2d 592 (Commonwealth v. Kithcart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Kithcart, 338 A.2d 592, 462 Pa. 155 (Pa. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The issues presented in the instant appeal having been waived by appellant’s failure properly to preserve them for appellate review, the order of the Superior Court must be affirmed, 225 Pa.Super. 729, 306 A.2d 337. Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357, 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A.2d 741 (1972). See Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418, 326 A.2d 272 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The issues presented in the instant appeal having been waived by appellant’s failure properly to preserve them for appellate review, the order of the Superior Court must be affirmed, 225 Pa.Super. 729, 306 A.2d 337. Commonwealth v. Reid, 458 Pa. 357, 326 A.2d 267 (1974); Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A.2d 741 (1972). See Commonwealth v. Clair, 458 Pa. 418, 326 A.2d 272 (1974).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 A.2d 592, 462 Pa. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-kithcart-pa-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack