Commonwealth v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. King

857 A.2d 1291

DecidedSeptember 28, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 857 A.2d 1291 (Commonwealth v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. King, 857 A.2d 1291 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Commonwealth v. Young, 849 A.2d 1152 (Pa.2004). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice RUSSELL M. NIGRO notes his dissent to the per curiam order as he would deny the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Commonwealth v. Young, 849 A.2d 1152 (Pa.2004). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Justice RUSSELL M. NIGRO notes his dissent to the per curiam order as he would deny the petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

857 A.2d 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-king-pa-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack