Commonwealth v. King, J.

184 A.3d 946
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 30, 2018
Docket457 EAL 2017 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 184 A.3d 946 (Commonwealth v. King, J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. King, J., 184 A.3d 946 (Pa. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by the Commonwealth, is:

Did the Superior Court commit a significant and potentially far-reaching error of law when, in contravention of Pennsylvania law and the greater weight of authority nationally, it issued a published decision holding that PCRA courts may bar the Commonwealth from speaking with [a defendant's] trial counsel prior to evidentiary hearings on defense claims that counsel provided ineffective assistance?

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth, Aplt. v. King, J.
212 A.3d 507 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.3d 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-king-j-pa-2018.