Commonwealth v. Kepper

114 Mass. 278
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Wells, J.

The written request to Campbell to “ give John Kepper ten dollars,” signed by Neff, was an order for money, within the meaning of the Gen. Sts. c. 162, § 1.

To sustain the charge of forgery, it was not essential that Campbell should have had in his hands any money due or belonging to Neff; or that he should have been under any legal obligation to accept and pay the order. Commonwealth v. Fisher, 17 Mass. 46. The King v. Lockett, 1 Leach, (4th ed.) 94.

The questions put to Neff in regard to his signature were unobjectionable both in form and substance.

The narration, in English, of the defendant’s admissions, made of court, in German, was covered by his oath as a witness. It is only when testimony, given in a foreign tongue, requires translation in court, that an interpreter is sworn specially for that purpose.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Kepper, 114 Mass. 278 (Mass. 1873).

114 Mass. 278 (Commonwealth v. Kepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Munoz-Casteneda
2012 COA 109 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2012)
Commonwealth v. O'Connell
783 N.E.2d 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2003)
Commonwealth v. O'Connell
769 N.E.2d 331 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Shooshanian
96 N.E. 70 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Johnson v. State
47 Fla. 35 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
State v. Kent
27 L.R.A. 686 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1895)