Commonwealth v. Kelly

70 Pa. Super. 133, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 191
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 Pa. Super. 134
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 10, 1918·No. No. 1; Appeal, No. 106·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The defendant was charged with desertion and nonsupport. Sufficient facts are presented to give the court jurisdiction, and after a full hearing on the merits of the case the sentence is in accordance with the statutes. So far as the record discloses the facts were rightly determined in the court below, and further than this we will not inquire: Commonwealth v. James, 142 Pa. 32; Commonwealth v. Dean, 21 Pa. Superior Ct. 641; Philadelphia v. Dezsi, 56 Pa. Superior Ct. 414.

The decree of the court below is affirmed, and the record remitted, and it is ordered that the appellant appear at such time he may be called and that he be by that court committed until he has fully complied with the sentence or any part of it that has not been performed at the time this appeal became a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Kelly, 70 Pa. Super. 133, 1918 Pa. Super. LEXIS 191 (Pa. Ct. App. 1918).

70 Pa. Super. 133 (Commonwealth v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Dean
21 Pa. Super. 641 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Philadelphia v. Dezsi
56 Pa. Super. 414 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Commonwealth v. James
21 A. 805 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1891)