Commonwealth v. Kelly

39 N.E. 776, 163 Mass. 169, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 67
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 28, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Holmes, J.

The defendant sold oleomargarine artificially colored by annatto so as to cause it to look like yellow butter produced from pure unadulterated milk, or cream from the same. It is settled that oleomargarine so colored is within the prohibition of St. 1891, c. 58, § 1, that the act has not been repealed, and that it is constitutional and valid as applied to oleomargarine so colored. Commonwealth v. Huntley, 156 Mass. 236. Plumley v. Massachusetts, 155 U. S. 461. Commonwealth v. Russell, 162 Mass. 520. We may add, that, if evidence could be considered to controvert facts manifestly assumed by the Legislature to be true, it is apparent from the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses that oleomargarine can be made, and is made and sold, without this coloring matter. In view of the above decisions, the case does not seem to us to need a fuller discussion.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Kelly, 39 N.E. 776, 163 Mass. 169, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 67 (Mass. 1895).

39 N.E. 776 (Commonwealth v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Health
204 N.E.2d 281 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Matter of Application of Foley
158 P. 1034 (California Supreme Court, 1916)