Commonwealth v. Kelly
This text of 39 N.E. 776 (Commonwealth v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant sold oleomargarine artificially colored by annatto so as to cause it to look like yellow butter produced from pure unadulterated milk, or cream from the same. It is settled that oleomargarine so colored is within the prohibition of St. 1891, c. 58, § 1, that the act has not been repealed, and that it is constitutional and valid as applied to oleomargarine so colored. Commonwealth v. Huntley, 156 Mass. 236. Plumley v. Massachusetts, 155 U. S. 461. Commonwealth v. Russell, 162 Mass. 520. We may add, that, if evidence could be considered to controvert facts manifestly assumed by the Legislature to be true, it is apparent from the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses that oleomargarine can be made, and is made and sold, without this coloring matter. In view of the above decisions, the case does not seem to us to need a fuller discussion.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 N.E. 776, 163 Mass. 169, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-kelly-mass-1895.