Commonwealth v. Keesey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Keesey

396 A.2d 34, 261 Pa. Super. 540

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 17, 1978

DocketAppeal, No. 767

StatusPublished

This text of 396 A.2d 34 (Commonwealth v. Keesey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Keesey, 396 A.2d 34, 261 Pa. Super. 540 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

[541]*541OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The record containing neither an opinion nor explanation by the lower court for its imposition of sentence, it is hereby ordered that the judgment of sentence be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. The sentencing judge is to file, forthwith, a statement of reasons for the particular sentence imposed. See, Commonwealth v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115, 377 A.3d 140 (1977); Commonwealth v. Martin, 466 Pa. 118, 351 A.2d 650 (1976); Commonwealth v. Kostka, 475 Pa. 85, 379 A.2d 884 (1977); Commonwealth v. Wertz, 252 Pa.Super. 584, 384 A.2d 933 (1978). Also see Pa.R.App.P. 1925.

PRICE, J., dissented. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[541]*541OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The record containing neither an opinion nor explanation by the lower court for its imposition of sentence, it is hereby ordered that the judgment of sentence be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. The sentencing judge is to file, forthwith, a statement of reasons for the particular sentence imposed. See, Commonwealth v. Riggins, 474 Pa. 115, 377 A.3d 140 (1977); Commonwealth v. Martin, 466 Pa. 118, 351 A.2d 650 (1976); Commonwealth v. Kostka, 475 Pa. 85, 379 A.2d 884 (1977); Commonwealth v. Wertz, 252 Pa.Super. 584, 384 A.2d 933 (1978). Also see Pa.R.App.P. 1925.

PRICE, J., dissented. WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 A.2d 34, 261 Pa. Super. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-keesey-pasuperct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack