Commonwealth v. Karetny

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Karetny

862 A.2d 590, 580 Pa. 563, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 3005

DecidedDecember 1, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 862 A.2d 590 (Commonwealth v. Karetny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Karetny, 862 A.2d 590, 580 Pa. 563, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 3005 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December 2004, the Commonwealth’s “Petition to Correct Misspelling of Names of Deceased Victims on the Record” is granted and it is ordered, pursuant to Pa.R.A.P.1926, that the record be corrected to reflect the proper spelling of the following deceased victim’s names: Jean Marie Ferraro, Monica Rodriquez, and DeAnn White. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted limited to the following three issues:

(1) Whether the evidence was sufficient for a prima facie case of risking a catastrophe;

[591]*591(2) Whether the Superior Court erred in its sua sponte application of the “general-specific” rule of statutory construction;

(3) Whether the Superior Court applied an erroneous “abuse of discretion” standard of review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI