Commonwealth v. Kale

371 A.2d 859, 244 Pa. Super. 574
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 20, 1976
DocketAppeal, No. 1599
StatusPublished

This text of 371 A.2d 859 (Commonwealth v. Kale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Kale, 371 A.2d 859, 244 Pa. Super. 574 (Pa. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

There is no indication on the record that appellant received the required written notice prior to his probation revocation hearing. The [575]*575judgment of sentence, therefore, is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to hold a new probation revocation hearing after written notice of the alleged violations. Commonwealth v. Stratton, 235 Pa.Superior Ct. 566, 344 A.2d 636 (1975); Commonwealth v. Henderson, 234 Pa.Superior Ct. 498, 340 A.2d 483 (1975); Commonwealth v. Alexander, 232 Pa.Superior Ct. 57, 331 A.2d 836 (1974).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Alexander
331 A.2d 836 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Commonwealth v. Stratton
344 A.2d 636 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Henderson
340 A.2d 483 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 A.2d 859, 244 Pa. Super. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-kale-pasuperct-1976.