Commonwealth v. Kale
This text of 371 A.2d 859 (Commonwealth v. Kale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
There is no indication on the record that appellant received the required written notice prior to his probation revocation hearing. The [575]*575judgment of sentence, therefore, is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to hold a new probation revocation hearing after written notice of the alleged violations. Commonwealth v. Stratton, 235 Pa.Superior Ct. 566, 344 A.2d 636 (1975); Commonwealth v. Henderson, 234 Pa.Superior Ct. 498, 340 A.2d 483 (1975); Commonwealth v. Alexander, 232 Pa.Superior Ct. 57, 331 A.2d 836 (1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
371 A.2d 859, 244 Pa. Super. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-kale-pasuperct-1976.