Commonwealth v. Josselyn
97 Mass. 411
Opinion
The defendant’s exceptions cannot be sustained. The complaint charged him with working on the Lord’s day by hoeing in his field; and the evidence for the Commonwealth was that he was hoeing in a field, in a part of his garden. There is no variance. Whether a garden is always a field or not, it may be in a field; and this was. The complaint was sufficient, and there was nothing to show any necessity for the defendant’s labor on that day. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Josselyn, 97 Mass. 411 (Mass. 1867).
97 Mass. 411 (Commonwealth v. Josselyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. McCarthy
138 N.E. 835 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Commonwealth v. White
77 N.E. 636 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Donovan v. McCarty
30 N.E. 221 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Day v. Highland Street Railway Co.
135 Mass. 113 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
Bucher v. Fitchburg Railroad
131 Mass. 156 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1881)
McGrath v. Merwin
112 Mass. 467 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)