Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A.
Opinion
.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 646 MAL 2020 :
Petitioner :
: Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :
: :
AKIM SHARIF JONES-WILLIAMS, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by the Commonwealth, are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States Supreme Court and this Court, in holding that 75 Pa.C.S. § 3755 does not independently support implied consent on the part of driver suspected or arrested for DUI, rendering the implied-consent statute unconstitutional?
(2) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2525 (2019), by finding that exigent circumstances did not exist to support a warrantless request to test Defendant’s blood?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A. (Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.