Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A.
This text of Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A. (Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 646 MAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : AKIM SHARIF JONES-WILLIAMS, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by the Commonwealth, are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States Supreme Court and this Court, in holding that 75 Pa.C.S. § 3755 does not independently support implied consent on the part of driver suspected or arrested for DUI, rendering the implied-consent statute unconstitutional?
(2) Whether the Superior Court issued a decision in conflict with and failed to properly apply and follow the binding legal precedent of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2525 (2019), by finding that exigent circumstances did not exist to support a warrantless request to test Defendant’s blood?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Jones-Williams, A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jones-williams-a-pa-2021.