Commonwealth v. Jones

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Jones

242 A.2d 471, 212 Pa. Super. 173, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1087

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 21, 1968

DocketAppeals, Nos. 251 to 258

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.2d 471 (Commonwealth v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Jones, 242 A.2d 471, 212 Pa. Super. 173, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1087 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In the instant case, our Court granted leave to file this appeal nunc pro tunc. It appears, however, that post-trial motions have not been filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 222 A. 2d 427 (1966). Accordingly, this case is remanded to the lower court to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. Should the said post-trial motions be dismissed, appellant shall have the right to appeal nunc pro tunc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In the instant case, our Court granted leave to file this appeal nunc pro tunc. It appears, however, that post-trial motions have not been filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Commonwealth v. Grillo, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 444, 222 A. 2d 427 (1966). Accordingly, this case is remanded to the lower court to allow appellant to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. Should the said post-trial motions be dismissed, appellant shall have the right to appeal nunc pro tunc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.2d 471, 212 Pa. Super. 173, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jones-pasuperct-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack