Commonwealth v. Jones

385 A.2d 946, 477 Pa. 593, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 947
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 1978·No. No. 34·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is a direct appeal from judgment of sentence entered upon appellant’s conviction by a jury of murder of the third degree. In the instant appeal, appellant raises the following three issues: That the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; that the prosecution’s attempts at trial to impeach one of its own witnesses was prejudicial to appellant; that appellant was prejudiced by the prosecutor’s reference in his opening statement to certain exhibits and by the subsequent display of these exhibits which were never admitted into evidence. We have considered these issues and find them to be without merit.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Jones, 385 A.2d 946, 477 Pa. 593, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 947 (Pa. 1978).

385 A.2d 946 (Commonwealth v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Jones
447 A.2d 1009 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Tallon
387 A.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)