Commonwealth v. Jones
This text of 29 N.E. 467 (Commonwealth v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question whether the government witnesses were or were not intoxicated at another time than that respecting which they testified in chief, was immaterial to the issue on the trial. The defendant, having asked the questions on cross-examination, must accept the answers. To introduce other evidence on the subject would raise a false issue.
In the cases cited by the defendant it was only determined that testimony given in chief might be contradicted.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 N.E. 467, 155 Mass. 170, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jones-mass-1892.