Commonwealth v. Johnson

979 A.2d 842
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 18, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with respect to the following issues:

1.) Whether the Superior Court erred in determining that the expert extrapolation method was appropriate for determining the weight of a controlled substance where the extrapolated estimate of the amount of the controlled substance minimally exceeds the weight required to impose a mandatory sentence?

2.) Whether a person who sells packets of heroin, which were retrieved from an automobile parked on the street by a third party who was sitting in the automobile and who accepted money from the sale, may be deemed to have constructively possessed additional packets of heroin stored [843]*843in the automobile found during a search conducted after his arrest?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Johnson, 979 A.2d 842 (Pa. 2009).

979 A.2d 842 (Commonwealth v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Johnson
26 A.3d 1078 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)