Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet

208 A.3d 56

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 1, 2019·No. 434 WAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the search warrant obtained to search [Petitioner's] cell phone was not unconstitutionally overbroad, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, by allowing an essentially unlimited search of the device for evidence of illegal narcotics and firearm possession?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the search warrant obtained to search [Petitioner's] cell phone was not unconstitutionally overbroad, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, by allowing an essentially unlimited search of the device for evidence of illegal narcotics and firearm possession?

Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet, 208 A.3d 56 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

208 A.3d 56 (Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related