Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet

208 A.3d 56

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 1, 2019

Docket434 WAL 2018 (Granted)

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 208 A.3d 56 (Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Johnson, L., Pet, 208 A.3d 56 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the search warrant obtained to search [Petitioner's] cell phone was not unconstitutionally overbroad, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, by allowing an essentially unlimited search of the device for evidence of illegal narcotics and firearm possession?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 1st day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court err in ruling that the search warrant obtained to search [Petitioner's] cell phone was not unconstitutionally overbroad, under the Pennsylvania Constitution, by allowing an essentially unlimited search of the device for evidence of illegal narcotics and firearm possession?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.3d 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-johnson-l-pet-pa-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack