Commonwealth v. Johnson
This text of 5 Ky. Op. 202 (Commonwealth v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The petition shows that Johnson, the sheriff, executed the bond upon which this action is based- -on the 20th of August, 1866, and that the official defalcation complained of did not occur until August, 1867. By the constitution and laws of this state Johnson’s first term of office -must have expired in January, 1867, and if he was re-elected it was the duty of the county court [203]*203to require 'him to execute a new bond and again take oath of office.
It is true -a sheriff holds until his successor is qualified, but no explanation is offered as to the reason for suing on the bond of August 20th, 1866, and in the absence of such explanation, it will not be presumed that the Pike county court failed to require Johnson to execute a second bond. We are therefore of the opinion that under the,state of facts set out in the petition the action could not be maintained. The demurrer was therefore properly sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. Op. 202, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-johnson-kyctapp-1871.