Commonwealth v. Jennings

269 S.W.2d 285, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1002
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided June 18, 1954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed by the Commonwealth’s Attorney of the Thirty-First Judicial District from an order of the Floyd ■Circuit Court permitting the prosecuting witness to employ special counsel, over the objections of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, to assist in the prosecution of one charged with a criminal offense.

An appeal 'by the Commonwealth in this type of proceeding is governed by sections 335 and 337 of our Criminal Code of Practice. In view of the fact that .the record affirmatively shows that the Attorney General has refused to participate in this controversy, and has also failed to take the appeal as required by section 337, Criminal Code of Practice, we are constrained to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

COMBS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Jennings, 269 S.W.2d 285, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 1002 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

269 S.W.2d 285 (Commonwealth v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Schumacher
566 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1978)