Commonwealth v. Jenkins
Opinion
The question is whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant the jury in finding that the school-house was on the same street as the Clinton House, within the meaning of the St. of 1882, c. 220. We think the rule must be, that where a school-house does not itself abut upon a street, but the lot on which the school-house stands does, the school-house must be taken to be upon the street or streets from which its entrances [574] are, and with which it is connected by the use made of it as a school-house. The entrance to the cellar across the engine-house lot, which was used only by the janitor, is not such a connection with Church Street that the school-house can be said to be on that street, within the meaning of the statute.
Exceptions sustained.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
137 Mass. 572 (Commonwealth v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.