Commonwealth v. Jaroma

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Jaroma

77 A.3d 633, 621 Pa. 335, 2013 WL 5524463, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2270

DecidedOctober 7, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.3d 633 (Commonwealth v. Jaroma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Jaroma, 77 A.3d 633, 621 Pa. 335, 2013 WL 5524463, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2270 (Pa. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of Commonwealth v. Brock, — Pa. -, 61 A.3d 1015 (2013) (holding that a motion to dismiss made pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600 must be made in writing, and a copy of such motion must be served on the Commonwealth’s attorney).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of Commonwealth v. Brock, — Pa. -, 61 A.3d 1015 (2013) (holding that a motion to dismiss made pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600 must be made in writing, and a copy of such motion must be served on the Commonwealth’s attorney).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.3d 633, 621 Pa. 335, 2013 WL 5524463, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jaroma-pa-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack