Commonwealth v. James

25 A.3d 276, 611 Pa. 278, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1679
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 26, 2011
Docket76 WAL 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 25 A.3d 276 (Commonwealth v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. James, 25 A.3d 276, 611 Pa. 278, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1679 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

*279 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue is:

Whether the Superior Court ruled inconsistently with decisions of [this Court] and of other panels of [the] Superior Court by determining that the Commonwealth was limited to the four corners of the search warrant in meeting [respondent’s] contention that two trash pulls, which were relied upon in part to demonstrate probable cause for the issuance of the warrant herein, were illegally conducted?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. James
69 A.3d 180 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Commonwealth v. Douglas
25 A.3d 276 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A.3d 276, 611 Pa. 278, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-james-pa-2011.