Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. James

Commonwealth v. James

368 A.2d 271, 470 Pa. 217, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 509
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 28, 1977
DocketAppeal No. 602
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 368 A.2d 271 (Commonwealth v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. James, 368 A.2d 271, 470 Pa. 217, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 509 (Pa. 1977).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., and O’BRIEN and POMEROY, JJ., would affirm the judgments of sentence. ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. James
427 A.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
368 A.2d 271, 470 Pa. 217, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-james-pa-1977.