Commonwealth v. Jacobs
This text of 3 Ky. Op. 76 (Commonwealth v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
An indictment for disturbing religious worship without stating how is not sufficiently specific to notify the accused of the character of the proof he will have to repel, or so to identify the offense as to make a judgment a bar to another prosecution for the same act of disturbance; and some specifications of the facts constituting the misdemeanor is necessary to enable the court, on demurrer, to decide whether, the facts being admitted, the law has been violated. Unlike “keeping a tippling house,” “disturbing religious worship” has no inherent or defined import.
Wherefore the indictment charging only a deduction from unstated facts is insufficient and the demurrer to it was properly sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. Op. 76, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-jacobs-kyctapp-1868.