Commonwealth v. Ivie

Botetourt County Circuit Court

Commonwealth v. Ivie

3 Va. Cir. 70, 1982 Va. Cir. LEXIS 73

DecidedSeptember 8, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. Cir. 70 (Commonwealth v. Ivie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Botetourt County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Ivie, 3 Va. Cir. 70, 1982 Va. Cir. LEXIS 73 (Va. Super. Ct. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

I am of the opinion that the defendant held title and possession of the property in question in trust for the Church, to-wit: "the collective membership of persons constituting the congregation" and that the Church in question is/was "another" within the context of Code of Virginia Section 18.2-96. When the defendant "took and carried away" the property in question, he violated his trust and converted the property to his own possession.

The intent to steal, that is the "animus furandi" is a question of fact which must be inferred from the totality of the circumstances. Here, I am of the opinion that the wrongful conversion infers the animus furandi. Slater v. Commonwealth, 179 Va. 899 (1918).

The defendant is guilty of larceny in violation of Code of Virginia, Section 18.2-111 (Embezzlement).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE DUNCAN M. BYRD, JR.

I am of the opinion that the defendant held title and possession of the property in question in trust for the Church, to-wit: "the collective membership of persons constituting the congregation" and that the Church in question is/was "another" within the context of Code of Virginia Section 18.2-96. When the defendant "took and carried away" the property in question, he violated his trust and converted the property to his own possession.

The intent to steal, that is the "animus furandi" is a question of fact which must be inferred from the totality of the circumstances. Here, I am of the opinion that the wrongful conversion infers the animus furandi. Slater v. Commonwealth, 179 Va. 899 (1918).

The defendant is guilty of larceny in violation of Code of Virginia, Section 18.2-111 (Embezzlement).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. Cir. 70, 1982 Va. Cir. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ivie-vaccbotetourt-1982.