Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors

110 Mass. 188
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Mass. 182
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1872·Published

Opinion

Colt, J.

The claimants failed to appear and make claim to the liquors seized. They were defaulted and never became parties to the proceedings. They cannot come in, after a judgment of forfeiture, and appeal from an order of the court under the St of 1869, o. 415, § 52, directing the disposition to be made of the forfeited property, or from the judgment of forfeiture. The order for the destruction of the liquors was not a “ judgment founded on matter of law apparent on the record ” from which an appeal can be taken. And the claimants not having been admitted to prosecute their claim, were not parties aggrieved by the order. Gen. Sts. e. 114, § 10.

It does not appear that the St. of 1872, e. 304, repealing the provision, had then taken effect. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors, 110 Mass. 188 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 188 (Commonwealth v. Intoxicating Liquors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.