Commonwealth v. Intersouthern Life Insurance
This text of 172 S.W. 1199 (Commonwealth v. Intersouthern Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[229]*229OpiniON op the Court by
Reversing.
This appeal is prosecuted by a revenue agent, in the name of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, dismissing without prejudice, and at the cost of the relator, this action, which was- brought against appellee for the purpose of recovering taxes on property alleged to have been omitted from assessment. In the opinion of the circuit court the dismissal of the action was authorized by Chapter 115, Artcle 2, Section 5, page 396, of the acts of 1912, because of the failure of the revenue agent to prosecute it with due diligence.
It is insisted for the appellant, and not denied by counsel for appellee, that the judgment is erroneous. In view of the construction given the act, supra, by us in Commonwealth v. Ewald Iron Co., 153 Ky., 116, decided since the judgment was rendered in the instant case, this contention must be sustained; and in the case of Commonwealth of Kentucky, by, etc., v. Standard Oil Co. of Ky., decided January 14, 1915, to be reported in 162 Ky., 149, a case on all-fours with the one under consideration, we found it necessary, under the ruling in Commonwealth v. Ewald Iron Co., supra, to reverse a similar judgment.
For the reasons indicated, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for proceedings in conformity with the opinion in the Ewald case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 S.W. 1199, 162 Ky. 228, 1915 Ky. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-intersouthern-life-insurance-kyctapp-1915.